Thinking Amish

Amish boyWhen I’m thinking about making a major purchase, I try to imagine how it will fit into my life. That’s often difficult, especially if it requires a fundamental change in lifestyle. For example, my sister avoided Netflix for a long time because it didn’t match her current habits (deciding to watch a specific movie and then going to Blockbuster for it). Once she tried it out, though, she realized that she liked being able to watch a good movie immediately more than she valued being able to watch a specific movie after going to the store.

It’s even more obvious with bigger items like houses and cars. How would your life change if you got rid of your car? Or moved to a different house or apartment? It’s hard to say, which makes really difficult to shop around for those things.

I think I often take it to extremes that most people don’t. I usually agonize for months before buying anything that costs more than $50-60. It took me about a month to get my current $90 running shoes (and that was only after trying and failing to get some cheaper ones online). I annoyed Maggie on and off for at least six months while I was deciding whether or not to get a DSL camera.

It turns out that there’s a whole group of people who are even more extreme than I am about evaluating life-changing technology: the Amish. For one thing, they think all technology is life-changing. I don’t disagree but I’ve already bitten the bullet as far as things like electricity are concerned.

Kevin Kelly has an interesting post up about Amish hackers, where he describes how the Amish decide which technology to accept and which to reject. In particular, Kelly says that the Amish have four main pillars that make their evaluation process successful (for them):

1) They’re not afraid to say no.
2) They ban (or accept) things based on the experience of their early adopters
3) The technology they accept must enhance family and community and distance themselves from the outside world.
4) They make their decisions communally.

That works for a relatively close-knit homogenous society. If you want to know whether or not genetically engineered corn will be good for you, it’s easier to see how it’s working out with Bob down the road than if you can only look at the results for strangers in far-off places.

Or, to go back to my personal examples, my sister only got Netflix because my parents tried it out first. She was able to see that a lifestyle working around Netflix was better than one built around Blockbuster.

There are so many different things out there that it can be hard to evaluate them all. I’m currently drooling over the new netbooks. Their low weight and long battery life (not to mention the low power consumption) are all very attractive. On the other hand, I’m almost always near an outlet and I only really take my laptop anywhere twice a week. Would it really be worth it to get a device dedicated to mobility when I already have a laptop that works okay?

Since my friends and family have no experience with them, it’s difficult to evaluate along the Amish criteria. I have found that laptops are worth the money. I remember a decade ago when I got my first laptop that I had the same qualms. If I have a perfectly good desktop, is it worthe spending extra money for the portability? Then, I could look at the experience of others around me to figure it out. Now, I’m making a similar decision in a vacuum.

The most important thing to the Amish is that new technology enhance family and community. It doesn’t make sense to analyze all of my purchases that way (my camera, fun as it is, doesn’t do much for the rest of the family), but I think it might make sense for a computer. Would having a more portable computer increase my connection to my community? Probably some, since I’d be more willing to bike or bus downtown and work there. But is it worth paying almost $400 for that increase? That I’m less sure about.

Comments (2) »

Podcast 2: Black Friday, gift wrapping, and traditions

Today, Maggie and I talk about Black Friday, green options for gift wrapping, and creating new traditions.

Buy Nothing Day, which we mention in the podcast, is run by Adbusters, a magazine focused on reducing consumerism.

This podcast is about 12 minutes long, which is twice as long as last week’s. Maggie and I aren’t sure what the best length is, so we’re hoping you’ll listen in and let us know what you like best. We look forward to your comments!

Comments (4) »

Amazon sells green(ish)

I’ve got some real topics to write about (a new bed and my new commute primarily), but I just got an email from Amazon saying that they have a new green section. I don’t agree with a lot of their criteria (is a computer really green just because it’s EnergyStar-compliant?) but I’d rather have people making semi-green choices than non-green choices. It’s also heartening that there are enough people who are doing things about the environment for Amazon create a category for them.

Apart from the word “Green” which seems to appear before every noun on the page, it looks pretty similar to a normal Amazon page. That includes the big top 10 list on the right. In this case, it’s the ten greenest items Amazon sells (as voted on by customers).

From best to worst, here’s the list as I checked this morning. See if you can tell which item doesn’t belong…

  1. Reusable bags
  2. CFL – 60-Watt equivalent
  3. CFL – 100-Watt equivalent
  4. Reel mower
  5. Seventh Generation toilet paper (although the picture sure looks like paper towels)
  6. Commuter bike
  7. Spinning composter
  8. Stainless steel water bottle
  9. Amazon’s Kindle
  10. Solar panels

Overall, the list is pretty good. I’m glad the top few are cheap and make a big impact. Reusable bags, CFLs, and a reusable water bottle (although further down) all replace lots of resources. More expensive, and requiring more dedication, are the bike, composter, and solar panels. The reel mower is good, although I don’t know how likely it is that people will replace a powered mower with one of those. And it’s not sexy, but recycled toilet paper is good if you haven’t gone the cloth route.

The last four items in Amazon\'s top 10 greenest products list (featuring the Kindle)But the Kindle? How did that make it into the top 10? E-book readers are very cool and I’d be tempted if e-ink weren’t so expensive, but they don’t seem very green. Perhaps it’s just that I get most of my books from the library, so the environmental impact is pretty low, but it seems like producing and powering a Kindle would create more waste than reading normal books and magazines.

Or maybe I just have trouble reconciling the other items on the list, which seem very granola, with a high tech device like the Kindle. In which case, I apologize to all of the composting, reel mowing, biking hippies who use their solar panels to power their Kindle and a couple of CFLs to read by!

Comments (1) »

Up to My Arse in Wallpaper

Maggie peeling wallpaperWe’ve had the house for less than 24 hours and I’m already psyched to pull off all the crazy textured wallpaper and rip up the carpet to reveal hardwood floors.  Alas, it’s a lot of work!  We spent several hours today pulling the top layer of wallpaper off the family room walls (the backing and paste tend to stay behind).  A guy from Vectren came by to turn on the gas and told me that I should make my life simpler and buy a gallon of magical solution called Dif that supposedly takes wallpaper right off.

I looked it up and learned that Dif is a wallpaper stripper with a “unique patented enzyme formula” and “a superior, more effective blend of wetting agents” that have made it a must-have for wallpaper removal projects.

Of course, my question is, what is the environmental impact of this stuff?  I looked at the MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) but it is really designed for firefighters and hazardous waste clean-up crews so there wasn’t detailed information about its overall environmental impacts.  I’m pretty sure Dif is more environmentally harmful than using hot water but I’m also pretty sure it’s a lot faster.  At what point can a person justify an increased environmental impact to save some physical labor?  For this project, I would feel a lot better sticking with the manual labor – I could use the exercise!  But the question of trade-offs comes up a lot and it’s almost always impossible to get all the information needed to make the best decision.

My dad says that someone needs to come up with a Green Consumer Reports that would crunch all the data concerning the environmental impact of how an item is produced, how it’s used during its life, and how it gets disposed of.  I keep telling him it’s a great idea except I don’t think that data even exists for most products.  But maybe someone just needs to give it their best shot and refine as they go.

Any publishing moguls out there?  I’m handy with a blog and a wallpaper scraper…

Comments (8) »