<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cap and trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greencouple.com/2009/03/05/cap-and-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greencouple.com/2009/03/05/cap-and-trade/</link>
	<description>Learning to live green and live together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 15:27:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://greencouple.com/2009/03/05/cap-and-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greencouple.com/?p=562#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Luci!  I usually like to do a second reading and get Maggie to proof me as well, but I was in a rush last night.  I was also apparently half-asleep, since there were a BUNCH of typos.  I just went through and fixed them, but I apologize for letting them through in the first place.

On my read-through, I also noticed that the article sounds pretty elitist at the end.  It&#039;s really not.  All of us have some of that person in us.  The one who prefers convenience to responsibility and who doesn&#039;t have time to figure everything out.  We all have our domains where that aspect of ourselves is paramount.  For me, one of those areas is cars.  I&#039;d rather just have one and go to the mechanic occasionally.  For other people, that&#039;s global warming.

The best part of cap and trade, if it works, is that it makes it easier for that aspect of us to get the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Luci!  I usually like to do a second reading and get Maggie to proof me as well, but I was in a rush last night.  I was also apparently half-asleep, since there were a BUNCH of typos.  I just went through and fixed them, but I apologize for letting them through in the first place.</p>
<p>On my read-through, I also noticed that the article sounds pretty elitist at the end.  It&#8217;s really not.  All of us have some of that person in us.  The one who prefers convenience to responsibility and who doesn&#8217;t have time to figure everything out.  We all have our domains where that aspect of ourselves is paramount.  For me, one of those areas is cars.  I&#8217;d rather just have one and go to the mechanic occasionally.  For other people, that&#8217;s global warming.</p>
<p>The best part of cap and trade, if it works, is that it makes it easier for that aspect of us to get the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luci</title>
		<link>http://greencouple.com/2009/03/05/cap-and-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-3149</link>
		<dc:creator>Luci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greencouple.com/?p=562#comment-3149</guid>
		<description>I think that this is a great and timely entry, but (and I mean this in the nicest way possible) it definitely could have used a second read-through before posting.  The typos automatically lend it less credibility, which I am very sure is not what you want!  Regardless, I thought you made some great points, especially about how the system could lead to a rise in the prices of consumer products.  Hey, maybe it will even have the added benefit of consumers purchasing less stuff they don&#039;t need, thereby helping to limit the amount of garbage produced annually.  Guess I&#039;m an idealist, too. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is a great and timely entry, but (and I mean this in the nicest way possible) it definitely could have used a second read-through before posting.  The typos automatically lend it less credibility, which I am very sure is not what you want!  Regardless, I thought you made some great points, especially about how the system could lead to a rise in the prices of consumer products.  Hey, maybe it will even have the added benefit of consumers purchasing less stuff they don&#8217;t need, thereby helping to limit the amount of garbage produced annually.  Guess I&#8217;m an idealist, too. <img src='http://greencouple.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

