Book Review: Last Child in the Woods

Last Child in the Woods by Richard LouvI just finished “Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder” by Richard Louv.  It’s on a lot of “must read” book lists and has generated a lot of enthusiasm for getting kids outdoors, while also creating some controversy.  The basic concept is that kids need exposure to nature in order to be physically, mentally, and spiritually healthy but our society has made it really difficult.  Some of the major obstacles are lack of open spaces, excessively busy schedules, fear of letting children explore outdoor areas, and concern of potential liability when kids do activities where they might get hurt like (gasp) climbing trees.

Most of the book was information I had heard before and parts of it were a bit dry but I enjoyed the way he wove it all together and came up with suggested solutions that attack the issue from multiple levels – getting our own children outdoors, exploring ways to bring environmental learning into our schools, and lobbying to have more nature-friendly city design.

I was most excited about reading his descriptions of Green Towns and other nature-friendly urban planning concepts.  I have toyed with the idea of being an urban planner for many years because I feel we could create really amazing places to live if we put some effort into it.  Sometimes I think the biggest challenge is convincing people to let go of the status quo.  People seem to worry a lot that switching to more eco-friendly designs will decrease their quality of life but I don’t think it’s true.  Wouldn’t we all enjoy living in towns were we could walk to the store or to work and where we had beautiful natural spaces to enjoy?  I think we just need to let go of the idea that life is incomplete without wide roads and 100% climate control.

In the end, I have not entered the realm of urban planning because redesigning cities is a very slow process that involves years of patient negotiation with a wide variety of stakeholders – community members who have various needs and desires, governments that are interested in maximizing property tax income while minimizing infrastructure costs, developers who want to stay in business, preservationists who want to save various historical sites and buildings, transportation networks, and oh, so many more.  It is not a battle I’m ready to take on.  Not yet, anyway.  But I do believe one of the best things any community can do is to develop a vision of what they *might* look like if everything worked out right.  Not a utopia.  Not some dream of perfection.  But a semi-realistic concept of a town that integrated into the ecological landscape, that supported the needs of all living beings in the area.  Humans are definitely important but I think the way for us to protect ourselves is to do a better job protecting everything else.

  del.icio.us this!

5 Responses so far »

  1. 1

    Jessica said,

    May 20, 2008 @ 1:40 pm

    I got a unique perspective of a pretty green community when I was deployed. In GTMO, you could walk anywhere you needed to go (although some of the command forced you to wear orange reflective plastic vests when you did so, even in the middle of the day when you’re on a side walk) If you didn’t feel like walking, there was ample public transportation (a few school busses), and there were a few cars on the island. It was perfectly safe to hitch hike, if you wanted to. There was one ferry to get you from one side of the island to the other, not that you really needed to use it often, because everything you needed was right there.
    When I got home that was probably the thing I missed most about GTMO. I had to drive everywhere. Driving never seemed like so much of a pain to me as it did right when I got home from my deployment. I never really recovered from it, to be honest. I’ve often wondered what it would take to build more communities that looked like Guantanamo Bay (minus the detention facility and the tin shacks we all lived in, of course). I would kill to live in a place like that again.

  2. 2

    arduous said,

    May 20, 2008 @ 7:11 pm

    Wow. Who knew GITMO was green! I guess every cloud has its silver lining. Thanks for sharing that story Jessica.

  3. 3

    Jessica said,

    May 21, 2008 @ 2:17 pm

    I don’t think it means to be green, its just a small, almost self contained community (we did ship food in, but other than that…), which is green whether they want it to be or not.
    The community part of it I miss often. The mission, not so much.

  4. 4

    Maggie said,

    May 21, 2008 @ 8:26 pm

    I miss living in a small community too. I enjoy being in my hometown where I have lots of family and recognize people fairly regularly on the street but for awhile in Oregon I lived in a community of 30 people and got to know them all really well.

    Small, self-contained communities do tend to be a little greener, even if that’s not the goal. So do very poor communities a lot of times. I’m always interested in the results, even in situations I wouldn’t want to replicate. Thanks for sharing your story.

  5. 5

    Geeks in the Woods | GreenCouple.com said,

    June 26, 2008 @ 10:37 pm

    […] probably a keynote presentation by Richard Louv, author of “Last Child in the Woods.” His book has become an essential resource for environmental educators and he was even more inspiring as a […]

Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Speak your piece